Statement of Facts

Duane Thompson knew that the Mack vs First Security Bank of Chicago fully supported my argument from the very start because of the way I worded my initial complaint against Beverly Rusk but he continued to misrepresent the facts and misrepresent that lawsuit all the way into an oral argument at the Appellate Court.

Judge Telleen, the Judge in a Malicious Prosecution lawsuit would not let me introduce any of the exhibits used in a jury trial I won that proved Duane Thompson or his client misrepresented the facts and the Judges in the Appellate Court simply used what Duane Thompson said I said as my Argument so Duane Thompson's reckless disregard of the facts and his reckless disregard of the law is now the basis for  Wittekind vs. Rusk 253 Ill.App.3d 577, 192 Ill.Dec. 467, 625 N.E.2d 427.

The funniest part about Wittekind vs. Rusk 253 Ill.App.3d 577 is where it states "prosecution of the plaintiff was supported by probable cause" because in reality defense of the plaintiff was supported by the probable cause when the statement of facts on the mind of Judge Brinn were used to completely impeach all three of the State's witnesses with prior inconsistent statements.   Exhibits at http://slimefest.com/Exhibits   A probable cause as reckless as the probable cause held against me becomes evidence of malice as proven by the argument that "Reversed and Remanded" the very precedent that Judges in the Appellate court incorrectly claim support a "Directed Verdict."

Duane Thompson knew that I had other "Evidence of Malice" because of the exhibit I added to the back of my "Brief and Argument" in case 3-91-0162  That exhibit was consistent with the facts presented in the jury trial I won proving that everything Beverly Rusk had used the courts for was based on tainted evidence from Donny Geiger.

Duane Thompson knew that tainted evidence can be used for a "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" argument meaning that everything Beverly Rusk used the courts for was malicious and that is the argument Duane Thompson's reckless disregard of the facts and his reckless disregard of the law prevented me from using in a "Malicious Prosecution lawsuit.

In other words, Duane Thompson's reckless disregard for the facts and his reckless disregard of the law concealed evidence of two malicious prosecutions and now that his recklessness is the basis for a legal precedent it is being used to obstruct justice of other innocent people.

A perfect example of how Duane Thompson worked is magic is by looking at a letter that he sent to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission because it proves how he says one thing and then at the same time he enters evidence to the contrary.
DuaneWasSoTricky/index.htm

Not only should something be done about Duane Thompson but something should also be done about others that watched him get away with misrepresenting facts and get away with misrepresenting a lawsuit and did nothing about it.